Hadrian
SpartanX vs Hadrian
Learn how SpartanX covers the full stack while Hadrian focuses on external surfaces only
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
| Category | SpartanX | Hadrian |
|---|---|---|
| Core Vision | Agentic AI Security Workforce, autonomous agents that Defend (remediation) and Attack (red-teaming) across the full stack. | Agentic EASM, AI continuously discovers and validates external attack surface exposures 24/7. |
| Mission Focus | Full lifecycle: discover → validate → prioritize → fix → simulate attacks → report. | External-facing: discover all assets an attacker can see, validate exploitability, prioritize by risk. |
| Scope of Coverage | Code → Infra → Cloud → APIs → LLMs → Continuous Red-Team. | External attack surface only, domains, subdomains, exposed services, cloud misconfigs, infostealers. |
| Automation Level | Multi-agent AI orchestration, autonomous workflows from discovery to auto-fix. | Autonomous AI discovery and validation of external exposures; no remediation automation. |
| Remediation Capability | Auto-generates code fixes + Pull Requests into developer repos. | No remediation, delivers prioritized findings for security teams to act on. |
| Offensive Security | Continuous 24/7 AI Red-Team integrated with defensive analytics. | NOVA agentic pentest product, external attack surface validation at pentest depth. |
| Internal / Code Coverage | Full code-level SAST, DAST, SCA, and developer workflow integration. | External only, no internal visibility, no code review, no CI/CD integration. |
| Knowledge Intelligence | Ontology-driven Knowledge Graph linking vulns ⇔ MITRE ATT&CK ⇔ business impact ⇔ compliance. | Attack surface graph for external asset correlation, no full business/compliance context. |
| Risk Prioritization | Exploitability + business impact + asset context + threat intelligence. | Sense → Attack → Plan: asset discovery → exploit validation → prioritized action plan. |
| False-Positive Handling | AI Validation Agents auto-retest and deduplicate findings. | Validated exposures only delivered, AI filters noise before reporting. |
| DevSecOps Integration | Deep integration with GitHub, GitLab, BitBucket, Jira, Linear, CI/CD. | No developer tooling or CI/CD integration. |
| Compliance Reporting | Auto-generates ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, HIPAA, NIST, GDPR, DORA, SOX reports. | No compliance framework automation. |
| Multi-Tenant / MSSP Ready | Native multi-tenant architecture for MSSPs and large enterprises. | Enterprise SOC teams; no MSSP multi-tenant architecture publicly available. |
| AI / LLM Security | Full LLM/AI red-teaming module. | No AI/LLM attack surface coverage. |
| Geographic Focus | Global, strong US commercial and MSSP market. | European-headquartered with strong EU enterprise customer base. |
| Outcome Speed | Detection → Auto-Fix → Report in minutes. | Detection → Prioritized findings → Manual remediation in days/weeks. |
| Market Positioning | AI Security Workforce, full stack, offense + defense, autonomous remediation. | EASM leader, external attack surface, AI-trained by elite hackers. |
| Ideal Users | CISOs, AppSec leads, DevSecOps engineers, MSSPs. | SOC teams, CISOs, GISOs managing complex external attack surfaces. |
SpartanX Key Advantages
External attack surface only, no internal or code coverage
Full stack from source code to external perimeter
No remediation capability
Auto-PR generation with validated fixes
No DevSecOps or developer workflow integration
Native CI/CD and repo integration
No compliance framework automation
Auto-mapped reports for ISO, PCI, HIPAA, NIST, GDPR
No AI/LLM attack surface testing
Dedicated LLM red-team module
No MSSP multi-tenant architecture
Native multi-tenant platform for service providers
European-centric customer base
Strong US commercial and MSSP focus
Defense-only after finding phase
Unified Defend + Offense platform with remediation built-in